Well, gee. Billed as 2010′s entry in the “indie flick that could” hot shit department, Winter’s Bone certainly has its redeeming qualities—particularly its stark cinematography and a superb lead performance by Jennifer Lawrence—but man, does it feel empty until a gripping sequence near the conclusion. I’d equate my reaction to Winter’s Bone to a lesser version of how I felt about the Coen’s True Grit, which I’d call underwhelming rather than soulless: in True Grit, the film meanders along, always enjoyable but never striking—save for, like Winter’s Bone, a wonderful female star turn in the lead—until the snake scene jolts it out of its sleepwalking solidness (let’s be honest; the Coen’s can do this in their sleep). However, at least the Coen’s track record of their work improving a second time through has me eager to take another gander at True Grit sometime in the future. Winter’s Bone…not so much. Aside from the production values, there’s just nothing to grab onto. Lawrence does everything she possibly can with her part, but its written as somewhat of a small-budget, austere caricature: an abandoned young girl deep in rural Missouri forced to mature in a hurry to care for her family, and overcome a ton of local resistance to her nosing around in the dark secrets lurking in her father’s past. Versions of this have been done endlessly. There’s no spice to it. It meanders along from point A to point B, always pretty and well-acted, but never engaging beyond the surface.
45/100

#1 by Eric on March 22, 2011 - 10:59 pm
Quote
Thank you SOOOOmuch for eloquently stating exactly what I was thinking!
#2 by Adam Marr on May 5, 2011 - 7:18 pm
Quote
Me too! I just saw it yesterday and found myself waiting for something interesting to happen. Also while watching it I kept thinking to myself if this were true it would make a great documentary. Especially whenever the real townsfolk were on screen. They stood out like sore thumbs or the other way round? I totally disagree with others that have said it debunks the hillbilly myth showing these people to be true fighters in a financial quagmire. I saw murderers, deserters, drug addicts and leechers. Not that they don’t exist in the city mind you. Beautifully shot and acted but when the main cast being the three siblings are absolutely gorgeous and the rest look like Frankenstein’s abandoned monsters it’s hard to take seriously. The end scene where she gets her Father’s hands could’ve been more gruesome too. Where were the bone sawing and chainsaw blade against the edge of the metal boat and water spraying everywhere in place of blood? If your violence is off screen make it loud!
#3 by Harry on May 11, 2011 - 12:28 am
Quote
I find it hard to understand the hype surrounding this predictable boring film.
Much of the time I found it hard to understand what the characters were saying-mumbling abounds.
I had little empathy with any of them and felt numb at the end of it.
Some of the photography was excellent but that alone cant redeem a very average film.
#4 by Sarah on October 7, 2011 - 12:44 am
Quote
I found this film absorbing, believable, and beautifully acted. Boring? To each his own, I suppose. This is a great film for too many reasons to list here.
#5 by Sarah on October 7, 2011 - 12:45 am
Quote
I found this film absorbing, believable, and beautifully acted, so much so that it seems real. There’s nothing for me to moderate to this comment; this is how I feel. It’s a great film for too many reasons to list here.
#6 by Tim on November 8, 2011 - 8:40 am
Quote
Guess it takes depth and a brain to appreciate this movie.
#7 by Dr.Bill on January 21, 2012 - 7:40 am
Quote
My wife and I found absolutely nothing compelling about this film except for the wonderful cinematography. I rented it from Netflix based on the critics 95% on the Tomatometer at Rotten Tomatoes.
Yet there was nothing to hold onto. It felt like Deliverance meets Goodfellas, and those two films were classics. Half the time, we couldn’t understand the dialogue and there should have been subtitles to accompany some of the redneck slang.
At the end, with the three kids sitting on the crumbling steps we looked at each other and said, “Wow, that was depressing.”
Pingback: Winter’s Bone « What movie should I watch?
#8 by Mark on May 27, 2012 - 7:24 pm
Quote
Interesting comments, but about half the review is about another movie. I’d rather read about Winter’s Bone than True Grit, which is a different movie with a different idea and path.
#9 by Lydia on June 26, 2012 - 11:35 am
Quote
@ Tim- agreed! I think that is what’s so beautiful about this movie. It has depth that is not obvious and not meant for people who are expecting instant gratification in their entertainment. If you are looking for that, the I suggest watching the fast and the furious.