Archive for July, 2011

THE OUTSIDERS (Francis Ford Coppola, 1983)

Oof. Talk about completely striking out: Francis Ford Coppola’s cheesy, overblown adaptation of S.E. Hinton’s wonderful novel captures none of the book’s gritty magic. One could certainly make the claim that the cast of young heartthrobs—Rob Lowe, Matt Dillon, Emilio Estevez, Patrick Swayze, Tom Cruise, et al—look the part of Greasers and Socs, the nicknames for the groups around town that fight, kick, claw and knife for neighborhood supremacy. But Hinton’s book is wrenchingly authentic, full of genuine humanity and conflicting emotions as Ponyboy Curtis (C. Thomas Howell, ironically one of the few actors who didn’t springboard to at least a modicum of success) endures the painful ups and downs of being raised by his two brothers as an orphan, tough love, loyal friendships, and heartbreaks of all different shapes and sizes. First and foremost, “The Outsiders” is about family. There’s none of that present in Coppola’s adaptation. Oh, occasional scenes hint at Coppola really understanding what Hinton’s about, but too much of the movie centers around war whoops, tough talk, and hammy dialogue. The acting is universally atrocious, especially Swayze as Ponyboy’s complicated big brother Darrel: only Ralph Macchio of Karate Kid fame turns in a halfway decent performance as the star-crossed Johnny. It’s a shame to say, but The Outsiders was made in the wrong decade—the typical 80′s style badly cheapened the source material, and poor execution across the board turned a crappy situation worse.

30/100

 

THE GREEN RAY / SUMMER (Eric Rohmer, 1986)

Eric Rohmer’s The Green Ray silkily lures you in, and before you know it, you’re fully engulfed in the world of Delphine (Marie Rivière), a perpetually depressed secretary who wants nothing more than true love, but lacks the confidence to really seek it out. Oddly obsessed with an ex-boyfriend and petrified of starting over, she finds herself at a loss when her traveling companion cancels their vacation plans last-minute. She wanders from Paris to Cherbourg to the Alps, trying different things at the urging of friends, yet finds herself weepier and more introverted with each stop. It’s not until she overhears a conversation about the green ray—a rarely glimpsed light that the sun emits if you catch it on the right day from the right angle—and subsequently meets a young man at the train station heading back to Paris that she begins to understand that life doesn’t have it in for her after all.

The Green Ray is interesting in that its protagonist is frequently unlikable, yet you can’t help rooting for her on some level—it’s reminiscent of Mike Leigh’s works in this regard. Delphine is full of self-pity, completely lacking in confidence, and her drab persona makes it tough to see why men would find her appealing in her current state. But as The Green Ray evolves, we begin to get to know Delphine through conversations and tearful meltdowns, and begin to sympathize with her more and more. Rohmer’s direction is sly, as he twists conventional techniques with great success—the ending could have been disastrously hokey, yet works marvelously under his strong hand. Structurally, the dialogue-heavy approach fits in nicely with the staggered summer days that Rohmer takes us through. It’s as if we ourselves are observing life, learning and evolving with Delphine.

76/100

X-MEN: FIRST CLASS (Matthew Vaughn, 2011)

I consider Bryan Singer’s X2 to be the finest comic book film this side of The Dark Knight (which stands as a man amongst boys in the genre), so I, perhaps unfairly, judge every subsequent entry against it. This one got a high number of positive reviews, so I was pretty excited to see if it stopped a disappointing trend of most comic adaptations of late outright sucking. Alas…though “suck” would be too harsh of a word for X-Men: First Class, it struggles to reach the “barely mediocre” threshold. Its attributes and weaknesses can be broken down into two categories: the relationship between Professor Charles Xavier (James McAvoy) and Magneto (Michael Fassbender), and everything else. The dynamic between the leaders of the X-Men’s primary factions is excellent, with explanations aplenty for non-followers of the comics themselves, terse and believable decision-making, and strong acting—I was skeptical of the choice of McAvoy, but he delivers, and Fassbender rarely misfires (and nails it here). Kevin Bacon hams it up, but I can dig it given the role…but the rest of the film is mostly tired clichés and typical summer blockbuster fare. The sequences involving Mystique could serve as advertisements for tired pump-you-up speeches, and Beast’s transformation is also a snooze. The Nazi backdrop, which has become quite prevalent in movies of this ilk, sort of works in theory, but never really pops with any creativity. And the prejudice subtext, the fear of those who aren’t “like us”, feels worn out at this point: hell, I’ve had enough of it watching politicians try to paint our current President as somehow foreign. As summer entertainment goes, you could do worse, but you could also do much better.

46/100

THE FRIENDS OF EDDIE COYLE (Peter Yates, 1973)

My goodness, did 2010′s (excellent) The Town lift large chunks from this one: character dynamics, masks, even a “count to 100″ walk. We’ll forgive Ben Affleck, though, because his fierce love of Boston is hardly a secret, and his take on the story is more homage than shoplifting anyway…and boasts plenty to admire in its own right. But back to The Friends of Eddie Coyle itself—Peter Yates’ crime drama is chock-full of wonderful moments, creative framing (especially an intrusion in a bank teller’s home early on in the proceedings), and emotional punch. An aging-but-always-recognizable Robert Mitchum plays Eddie, a convicted small-time felon who couldn’t keep his nose clean and faces a long prison sentence for repeat offenses. Faced with losing his family just as he was settling into a happy life at home, he decides to snitch on some of Boston’s most well-known thugs in the hope that Detective Foley (Richard Jordan) will make some calls and get him off the hook. But who to trust, who to trust: life’s age-old question rears its ugly head at every turn. The Friends of Eddie Coyle is endlessly entertaining, with exciting stick-ups and a mesmerizing gun sale in the woods, yet its not just popcorn fun—Yates (Breaking Away) infuses the film with some serious soul. It’s impossible to not feel for Eddie (thanks in large part to Mitchum’s understated, spot-on performance), who comes across as a mostly harmless man who got caught up in the wrong game, and could never quite figure out how to unravel himself. That doesn’t excuse his actions, of course, but he’s a sympathetic protagonist. The entire cast turns in virtuoso performances, with Steven Keats as the loudmouthed, firebrand arms dealer Jackie Brown sprinting away from the pack with a tour-de-force. For fast-paced fun with heart and Boston soul, it’s tough to find fault with The Friends of Eddie Coyle: I can definitely see revisiting this one over the years.

78/100

BATMAN: UNDER THE RED HOOD (Brandon Vietti, 2010)

An extremely dark, brisk chapter in the Dark Knight’s ever-popular screen sagas, Batman: Under the Red Hood is 75 minutes of animated mutterings, pain, action, and bloodshed, along with an unquenchable thirst for revenge. As usual, the story is set in a crime-riddled Gotham City, but while the Joker plays an important role here, his presence lingers over the entire proceedings rather than dominating onscreen. In fact, traditional Batman villains take a backseat to the mysterious “Red Hood,” a supremely talented criminal who’s seemingly taken over the city’s underworld. Something familiar about his skill set gnaws at Batman throughout their chases and chance encounters. While there’s nothing dazzling about the film, it’s surprisingly touching at times, and really eschews any sort of cheap fluff—there’s nary a dull moment, even though the secrets are pretty simple to decipher. Big names like Bruce Greenwood and Neil Patrick Harris (NPH!) lend their heft to the voice acting, and the workmanlike animation gets the job done, painting a gloomy picture of thug-infested nights and dangerous foes while giving viewers a glimpse at another potential side of Batman, though in the end, his core values remain what they’ve always been throughout history. Batman: Under the Red Hood was a straight-to-video release, usually the kiss of death, but I advise admirers of the caped crusader not to be duped: this one’s well worth your time.

68/100

GONE WITH THE WIND (Victor Fleming, 1939)

The golden standard for classic Hollywood bombast, this one. An extremely difficult film to grade when seeing it for the first time in 2011 at the ripe old age of 31—yes, it was an egregious gap for far too long. It’s sumptuous, gorgeous to look at, and packed to the brim with over-the-top, yet glorious, melodrama at its grandest scale. And the acting! Clark Gable, as the mischievous millionaire with a penchant for spitting on the honor that defined the 1860′s South, is positively riveting. Right behind him is Vivien Leigh as the spoiled firecracker Scarlett O’Hara, an electric bombshell who likes to fashion herself a lady befitting the era, but can’t resist acting like a rebellious schoolgirl. Trouble is, Scarlett’s longing for a more noble life keeps her obsessed with Ashley Wilkes (Leslie Howard), a Gentleman in every sense of the word…who happens to be married to Scarlett’s astonishingly sweet and kindly cousin Melanie Hamilton (Olivia de Havilland).The chemistry between all four is something to behold, and the supporting cast isn’t far behind: standouts include Hattie McDaniel as the O’Hara’s gruff, loyal and loving slave (more on this in a bit) Mammy, Ona Bunson as the smoky Belle Watling, and the ubiquitous-for-the-30′s-and-40′s Thomas Mitchell (Make Way for Tomorrow, It’s a Wonderful Life, etc) as Gerald O’Hara. Even the Technicolor still pops in a way many films of the time don’t anymore, the swelling music and sweeping shots almost impossible to resist.

And yet…it’s very difficult to overlook the extreme racism and the romanticism of American history’s darkest times that drip through every scene. The title sequence warns the contemporary viewer what we’re in for, claiming that the finest days are “gone with the wind.” Said days, of course, refer to the magical times of plantations, ravishing houses for whites, and a complete lack of rights for blacks. The aforementioned honor referred only to those born into it, which required white skin. And Gone With the Wind glorifies it all: every slave loves their master dearly, even sticking with them after the South loses the Civil War. In fact, there’s a nary a perceptible change in the actions of the film’s enslaved throughout the entire four-hour runtime. They’re all portrayed as part of the family, caring for the children like they’re their own, feeling the pain of loss and the joys of success like a parent. Such a view, of course, is utterly ludicrous, and makes it difficult to really take much of the film seriously once you dig beneath the surface. As a historical artifact, it’s a must-watch, and its numerous strengths make it well-worth seeing, especially if it makes an appearance on the big screen in your area. But though I enjoyed it a good deal, I can’t bring myself to truly love a movie so deeply steeped in prejudice…and, truth be told, it occasionally feels too bombastic, even when viewed through the prism of its genre. See it, love it for its wonders, loathe it for its backdrop and politics, and check it off your list.

68/100